large font
bold text
italicized text
red text
blue words
green stuff
linked text
left justified: The Byrne problem will still exist with sticky (future-dated) posts.
I think changing aggregations from created_on dates would be a bad idea for this reason.
I agree with Ben that the created_on date should probably not be fudged--since it's used for this reason. We can set the issued date to whatever it was in the original post and a user can edit that if they want it to sort differently on their Vox blog.
I think changing aggregations from created_on dates would be a bad idea for this reason.
I agree with Ben that the created_on date should probably not be fudged--since it's used for this reason. We can set the issued date to whatever it was in the original post and a user can edit that if they want it to sort differently on their Vox blog.
right justified: The Byrne problem will still exist with sticky (future-dated) posts.
I think changing aggregations from created_on dates would be a bad idea for this reason.
I agree with Ben that the created_on date should probably not be fudged--since it's used for this reason. We can set the issued date to whatever it was in the original post and a user can edit that if they want it to sort differently on their Vox blog.
I think changing aggregations from created_on dates would be a bad idea for this reason.
I agree with Ben that the created_on date should probably not be fudged--since it's used for this reason. We can set the issued date to whatever it was in the original post and a user can edit that if they want it to sort differently on their Vox blog.
centered: The Byrne problem will still exist with sticky (future-dated) posts.
I think changing aggregations from created_on dates would be a bad idea for this reason.
I agree with Ben that the created_on date should probably not be fudged--since it's used for this reason. We can set the issued date to whatever it was in the original post and a user can edit that if they want it to sort differently on their Vox blog.
I think changing aggregations from created_on dates would be a bad idea for this reason.
I agree with Ben that the created_on date should probably not be fudged--since it's used for this reason. We can set the issued date to whatever it was in the original post and a user can edit that if they want it to sort differently on their Vox blog.
justified: The Byrne problem will still exist with sticky (future-dated) posts.
I think changing aggregations from created_on dates would be a bad idea for this reason.
I agree with Ben that the created_on date should probably not be fudged--since it's used for this reason. We can set the issued date to whatever it was in the original post and a user can edit that if they want it to sort differently on their Vox blog.
I think changing aggregations from created_on dates would be a bad idea for this reason.
I agree with Ben that the created_on date should probably not be fudged--since it's used for this reason. We can set the issued date to whatever it was in the original post and a user can edit that if they want it to sort differently on their Vox blog.
- item 1
- item 2
- item 3
- bullet 1
- bullet 2
- bullet 3
blockquoted: The Byrne problem will still exist with sticky (future-dated) posts.
I think changing aggregations from created_on dates would be a bad idea for this reason.
I agree with Ben that the created_on date should probably not be fudged--since it's used for this reason. We can set the issued date to whatever it was in the original post and a user can edit that if they want it to sort differently on their Vox blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment